Orqestra · operational orchestrationRules / roles / evidence

What entersunclear,leaves decided.

Orqestra turns your rules, roles and documents into a clear workflow — from the request received to the decision recorded.

Portals · approval workflows · back offices · verifiable documents

Living case
Demonstration scenarioCurrent state
RequestUnder review
01 · Input
Documents receivedReceived
02 · Check
Rules appliedChecked
03 · Ownership
Review assignedPending
04 · Output
Decision documentedTraceable
One inputOne ruleOne decision
  1. Received
  2. Checked
  3. Pending
  4. Assessed
  5. Escalated
  6. Decided
  7. Documented
  8. Closed
Each colour appears because a state exists — never as decoration.
01 · Before

A process does not break. It scatters.

A rule applied from memory, a document kept outside the case, an approval without a reason: the workflow continues, but nobody shares the same reality.

Each channel seems right in isolation. Together, they contradict one another—without producing a reliable status, a clear owner or complete evidence.

Operational diagnosisCase · 0427
Shared reality unavailable
Case realityConflict · 01
Email claimsCase completebut the case shows

Document not attached

Reliable stateUnknown
Observable consequences
  1. 03versions in circulation
  2. 02conflicting statuses
  3. 00identified owners
  4. 01decision without a reason
02 · With Orqestra

Put the case in order.

Scattered elements become a governed workflow: every document gets a status, every step an owner and every exception a visible rule.

  1. InputForm received · status unknown
  2. DocumentSupporting document received outside the workflow
  3. EvidenceReceipt received · not attached
  4. CriterionCondition met · workflow unchanged
  5. QuestionWho owns this case?
  6. DecisionApproval sent · justification missing
  7. RuleObtain approval before decision
  8. Follow-upWhat is the next action?
  1. 01Disorder
  2. 02Structure
  3. 03Rule
  4. 04Ownership

03 · Eight situations

One rules engine. Realities that look nothing alike.

A request desk, an assessment panel, a branch network, a non-conformity register: the people and pressures change; the structure of the system remains.

Submission → Decision

Intake & Cases

An organisation receives hundreds of applications, support requests or administrative cases. Every case must be complete, reviewed by the right person and decided on time.

Workflow map01 · Submission → Decision
  • Applicant
  • Case reviewer
  • Service manager
  • Management
01SubmissionApplicantReceived
02CheckRulesChecked
03ReviewReviewerPending
04DecisionManagerDecided
Active rules

R-01If a required document is missing, the case returns to the applicant with the list of expected documents.

R-02If the amount exceeds the defined threshold, management approval is required before the decision.

The challenge

Documents arrive incomplete, versions multiply, and nobody can tell where a case stands without sending an email.

The delivered system

An online portal connected to a back office where every case has a status, an owner and a complete history.

What Orqestra coordinates
  1. 01Multi-step submission, with save and resume
  2. 02Completeness checks before review
  3. 03Assignment to the right reviewer using your criteria
  4. 04Sequential or parallel approval workflows
View solution Intake & Cases
04 · In production

Two contexts. One requirement: know where every case stands.

Demonstration scenario01 / 04 · Application
Candidate portal

New application

Received
Phase 01 · Information
Candidate identity
Partner entity
Selected framework
Phase 02 · Skills
01Supporting documentLocked
02Declared experienceRecorded
03SkillsPre-filled
Passwordless authenticationInput recorded · history created
Rules engine

Eligibility check

Checked
Case receivedApplication · Demonstration

Framework, skills and documents attached to one authoritative version.

R-01Document completenessCompliant
R-02Skills frameworkApplied
R-03EligibilityValidated
Decision produced by the rulesWorkflow opened for assessment
Assessor workspace

Multi-criteria scorecard

Assessed
Level 01Fundamentals
Complete
Level 02Practical assessment
Calculation in progress
Level 03Final validation
Upcoming
Assigned assessorShared scorecard · automatic calculationJustification required
Every change is added to the audit trailDecision documented
KAFAA Programme · Demonstration

Certificate of
skills

Demonstration case

Framework
Skills validated
State
Documented
Identifier
KAFAA-DEMO-024
Verifiable
Verification page

Document recognised

The identifier and QR code connect the certificate to its verification page.

StateValid
Audit trailRetained
Pre-filled PDF · QR codeVerifiable output
Reference 02 · In production
02

HappyTaux

Online credit broker

A broker offers financing solutions to individuals, independent professionals and businesses. The journey runs from the online request through document analysis and offer comparison to contracting.

People in the workflow
  • Applicant
  • Analyst
  • Financial partner
  • Back office
Read the full case
Demonstration scenarioCase · Financing
Received
Active stage

Request

Multilingual request portal with a step-by-step form

Owner
Applicant
State
Received
Output
Request received
Multilingual portalAssessment & scoringSignature & PDF
Organisations we have supported

Institutional, professional and private contexts.

The sector changes. The requirement does not: move every case forward using visible rules and retain evidence of every decision.

Reference register04 organisations
  1. 01Ministère du TourismePublic institutionSupported
  2. 02Confédération Nationale du TourismeProfessional confederationSupported
  3. 03HappyTauxCredit brokerSupported
  4. 04MAG ManagementCompanySupported
One architecture of trustStates · ownership · evidence
05 · Your workflow

Which process needs to move?

Give us the starting point. A few lines are enough for the UPOUI team to understand the people, rules and point where the workflow gets blocked.

  1. 01You describe the workflow
  2. 02We identify the people, rules and pressure points
  3. 03We propose a scope and estimate
05/01Scoping brief
To describe

Describe its starting point, the people involved and where it gets blocked.

A few lines are enough to get started.0 / 1500
Starting pointPeopleRulesBlocking point

You can review and complete this context before sending it.